Sunday, 6 September 2015

Measuring the success of your shiny new toy

I like to think of myself as an ‘early adopter’; check me out, aren’t I clever! I love trying new things. I really enjoy jumping in and figuring out to use a new technology, a new social media channel, a new product which guarantees to change your life for the better. However, if you’re going to spend time and money trialing something new, especially lots of your company’s money, it’s worth thinking beforehand about how you’re going to measure the success of your new-fangled toy.

Recently, a company presented something shiny and new to my colleagues. This something new was exciting and potentially useful, so we agreed a trial. I watched as some of our more eager beavers (not the technical term) embraced the new tool and started creating. Then some bright spark asked how we were going to measure whether the trail had been successful. I was disappointed that it wasn’t me who’d raised this issue, as I like to pride myself on being slightly obsessed with measurement, as per previous blog posts. But, I consoled myself with the fact that maybe my banging on about measurement has rubbed off on my colleagues. Anyway, good point (whoever made it!)

It’s not too late, we can still measure the success of the product, because the folks who created it were clever enough to realise that it would be pretty hard to justify/sell without analytics. But how many people would have to embrace the new tool for us to consider it a success? Would it be a success if a handful of senior people loved it? Or if hundreds of junior people found it useful?

It got me thinking, that before we embrace a new technology or jump headfirst onto a new social media channel, we ought to make sure we’re clear on what problem it’s going to solve and how we’ll know if it’s solved it.
  • What does the product/technology do?
  • What problems that we currently experience could this fix?
  • What will it cost, both in terms of cold hard cash and time?

Okay, so we’ve decided to go ahead with the trial, how are we going to measure the success?
  • Is it enough for the trial to just be better than the current solution/work-around? 
  • How will we know if things are better?
  • Can we gather data and/or qualitative feedback from users?
It’s easy to fly magpie-like to the newest shiny thing, I do it a lot, but before we do, do you know how to recognise if it’s solid gold or fools gold?

Thursday, 27 August 2015

The day the laptop died - how to have the most creative and productive afternoon of your life

On Thursday 23rd July 2015, I was asked to get an Ignite Talk at a PRCA (Public Relations Consultants Association) event. The topic was 'digital creativity'. We could talk about any aspect of that subject, except we weren't allowed to talk about work. This left me slightly flummoxed, because any time I have ever been asked to give a presentation before , it’s been about something I’m working on, on a subject that I’m an ‘expert’ (?!) in. Luckily for me, just when I’m wondering what to talk about, and watching old Ignite Talks to try to understand the format, my laptop dies. This is lucky because my laptop dying becomes the topic of my talk. Here follows my presentation:

What I’m about to tell you will give you the power to have the most creative and productive afternoon of your life. Disclaimer, this is not guaranteed! First a couple of questions:
  1. How many people here sit in front of a computer screen for much of the day?
  2. How many people here pride themselves on their ability to multi-task?
I’m one of those people who gets into a lift and pushes the close doors button, repeatedly, even if the doors are closing. Actually, that’s an example of impatience, not multi-tasking…  Hmm… Okay, so I’m an impatient multi-tasker.
And this love of multi-tasking means that I always have a LOT going on on my laptop... I used to be a journalist; I used to have access to the wires and was constantly receiving news snaps from PA and AP and AFP.

My screen nowadays buzzes with email alerts, and Twitter alerts, and instant messenger, and GChat. Always open, always on. So, there I am, with my 30 different tabs open, multi-tasking like a good ‘ne when suddenly my computer screen flickers and what looks like the code from the matrix starts scrolling up the screen. So, I do what I always do when something goes wrong, I pick up the phone and dial our IT support team in Hyderabad in India. Except they can’t help me, because the way they work is to logon to your computer remotely to see what the problem is. And my computer by this stage has turned itself off and won’t turn back on again.

Well, says the nice lady woman on the phone in India, I’ll ask local IT to come take a look. Local IT? Local IT? Nearly three years of working for this company and now I find out we have an IT person in the building?!

So, I wait patiently (not a strong point as we’ve already established) and an IT chap turns up at my desk… diagnoses my laptop as ‘broken’ and takes it away. He says I’m to come see him in 20 minutes to see what’s what. He takes my computer away… What on earth am I supposed to do now? I do the only thing that a British person can do in this situation. I go make myself a cup of tea. And after about 10 minutes, did I mention my lack of patience? I go upstairs. It’s not good. My hard drive has failed and I can’t get a replacement laptop until Monday.

So, I am expected to work without a laptop? How? The IT chap says I shouldn’t worry because it’s the last Friday of the month so everyone will be finishing at 5pm for the company drinks. Company drinks? We have an IT team? And now it turns out we have company drinks? Now to be fair to me, I’m not a complete anti-social idiot, these company drinks are organised by a different department, so it’s not like I officially should have been invited. But now, I am being invited, by the chap in IT. And I’m agreeing to go along, because quite frankly I don’t have a laptop, so I don’t have any work to do.

Back at my desk, reeling from the fact that we have an IT team in the building and last Friday of the month company drinks. I suddenly remember I’m supposed to be on a conference call. I jump on the call, and I’m listening and I’m talking, and I’ve got some ideas to share, and then I have some more ideas to share, and I’m listening some more, and it’s brilliant. It’s the best call I’ve been on in years, maybe even ever. I’m on fire, everyone on the call is on fire, and it’s fantastic.

We solve problems; we generate actions, lots of actions. I get off the call and I’m totally pumped, I’m full of energy and I don’t need my usual three O’clock diet coke. And I’m confused… why was that such a good call? I hadn’t been looking forward to that call. We had some tough decisions to make, some awkward conversations to have, and it went really, really well. Suddenly it occurred to me… The difference between that call and all the other calls I ever have? No laptop!

Instead of putting on my headset, putting the phone on mute, and allowing the incoming emails, instant messages and Tweets to distract me. And I hadn’t realised quite how much they were distracting me. I just participated in the call. I focused totally on the call, nothing else.

Call over, I look at my to-do list… and realise I can’t do a single thing on it without my laptop. So, I go get myself some paper and some pens from the stationary cupboard, and I start scribbling: ideas from the call; other ideas not related to the call; things we’d discussed at a strategy meeting months before. Before I know it, it 5 O’clock, time for drinks. And the drinks were great? I meet a bunch of new people, we figure out some cool ways we can work together in the future.

When I arrive at my desk on Monday morning and a replacement laptop is waiting for me at my desk, I am almost a bit disappointed. Of course, after 5 minutes I had it booted up and 100 different tabs whizzing and whirring. And then I suddenly think, hold on, last Friday I had the most creative and productive afternoon of life.

So, will you humour me, and try something with me on Friday afternoon? At about two thirty, turn off your laptop. You don’t have to break your laptop, although you can if you really want to, instead, just turn it off. Make some phone calls, get some paper and some pens and start thinking about the big picture stuff. Do not do anything on your very tactical to-do list. Go find out if you’ve got an IT team? Are there any drinks? If not, organise some. Stop multi-tasking and rushing and just allow yourself time to think and focus. You might be surprised by what you can achieve without your laptop.

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

Twitter training

I am fairly regularly called upon to conduct Twitter trainings; whether it's friends informally asking for a demo, leaders I volunteer with a Girlguiding LaSER, or colleagues at work. To be honest, at first, when anyone would ask to 'learn' how to use Twitter, I would think to myself: really? No one taught me how to use it, why can't you just teach yourself, like I did? But that seems rather churlish and unhelpful, particularly when the person asking you to help the senior management team is the CEO!

So, for a Twitter 101 and 102, may I share two videos I created for Girlguiding LaSER. When it comes to getting started, it really doesn't matter whether you're a Brown Owl or a Senior Vice President.

Twitter training Part 1

Twitter training Part 2

I also thought it might be useful to share the notes below. Before I give a presentation, or conduct a training, or do pretty much anything that requires preparation, I like to make a list. Not a neat, numerical list, but a kind of really rubbish storyboard type list (click the image below to expand).

I honestly still believe the best way to learn how to use Twitter is to just open an account and start listening to the conversations going on. But, for those people who like to know what they're doing before they start (this has clearly never been something that bothers me!) then I hope the videos and note above help. 

I have to use Twitter as part of my job, but it's more than that, it has become the main way I find out news and it is a fantastic source of inspiration. So, why not find me on Twitter @CCMart1n and say "hello!"

Tuesday, 28 April 2015

Wanted: Hard Working Journalist For Sexy Tech Company

Like all good former journalists, I was interested to read that Snapchat has hired CNN reporter Peter Hamby, as their Head of News. I was interested because, as a former journalist, I like to see where other people go when they become former journalists.

Once I'd waded through the congratulatory messages on Twitter, I came across a tweet promoting this article: Another Social Platform (Snapchat) Hires a Journalist (Good Luck With That), in which Ad Age journalist, Alex Kantrowitz considers previous examples of journalists hired by tech companies. 

Now I do not consider myself to be in the same league as Peter Hamby, or any of the other journalists mentioned in the article, but I did move from journalism (Local radio and then the Press Association, I know, hardly CNN!) to tech (Google).

Why do journalists leave journalism for the bright lights of tech companies? Money? Well, journalists are notoriously badly paid, so this is part of it, but it's also about curiosity. A good journalist is curious, always asking questions, wanting to discover new things, and tech companies offer new things and questions in spades.

Why do tech companies want journalists? Well, I'd like to think that they recognise and value the skills that a journalist can bring to their company. Skills like: enthusiasm, determination, a strong work ethic and a questioning nature. 

Doesn't it just sound like a match made in heaven! Except for those occasions, as Alex highlights in his article, where it doesn't work out. I think there are a few possible reasons for why... 

Tech companies are natural homes for engineers and scientists and even sales people, but are they a good fit for journalists? A lot of journalists are cynical, (no really..?! And sarcastic!) particularly those who have been around the block a few times. It is this cynicism that helps them question when something seems to good to be true. It is this cynicism that allows them to poke their nose into things that other people just accept. But this cynicism doesn't always fit with the sunshine and positivity of Silicon Valley. 

Some Tech companies aren't yet completely convinced of the value of content, despite hiring journalists to create it. They are used to a product that is easily measured and brings a return on investment. I'm not saying content can't be measured or proven to work, but it is harder and requires a longer-term investment. I've seen tech companies 'try' content and then panic when they don't see results, or can't full understand what is and isn't working immediately. 

Many people become journalists because they want to 'make a difference'. I know it sounds cheesy, but I remember interviewing candidates for two different roles on the same day, the first was for a journalist, the second for a sales person. With each potential new journalist recruit, I asked why they had chosen journalism for their career and listened to a string of passionate, fascinating and inspiring reason. When I asked the people interviewing for the sales role the same question, I got confused looks and mumbles about just stumbling into it, or liking the commission. Perhaps, not always, but perhaps they think they can make a difference at the tech company they join, and they're left disappointed. I recently heard that Google now has 55,000 employees, difficult to stand-out and make a difference in that size of an organisation. And perhaps in a small tech company, where management is focused on the product, content ends up as a nice to have. 

I'm not saying it can't work, because there are plenty of real-life examples where it has worked. I don't regret leaving journalism and joining Google for one second. And let's face it, joining a tech company has got to be a better option than the other career choice open to people wanting to leave journalism.. becoming a PR person!